Award Winners—The Answer!
Caldecott. Newbery. Coretta Scott King. Oh my! I’ve now read at least two books that have won or been nominated for each of the aforementioned awards. Are these books really better than their contemporaries? Here are my findings:
From what I’ve learned, each of these honors focus on different aspects of books/different types of literature. The Caldecott is awarded to picture books based upon their artistic quality. The pictures should reflect the plot and should be appropriate for children. The Newbery Medal is awarded to children’s books that have literary merit and clear literary elements (plot, characters, setting, etc.). The Coretta Scott King award is given to children’s literature that has literary merit and is created by African-American authors or illustrators.
I can’t claim that one award is better than another but since I work with older students, sixth grade and up, and since I have no children, I haven’t developed an affinity for picture books. However,
The Lorax by Dr. Seuss is one of my favorite books and I think this is because the message is so strong—you are in charge of your own future and the world needs you to make a difference. Caldecott winners like
Kitten’s First Full Moon, while sweet, don’t usually carry the same intense messages. They are meant for a very young audience and cater to them.
The Newbery Medal also awards books for a young audience but on the basis of literary merit and I can relate to this award more than the Caldecott. However, I am not a fan of Newbery books as I’ve mentioned and I did not become a fan. I found
The Graveyard Book to be boring and
Princess Academy, while enjoyable, not particularly engrossing. I feel that the Newbery Medal doesn’t takes actual children’s opinions into consideration when honoring novels. They award literature that adults would like for children to read while the Caldecott awards books that children will actually enjoy.
The Coretta Scott King (CSK) awards illustrators and authors, a combination of the Caldecott and Newbery awards, but the CSK only honors African-Americans. Out of the nine awarded books I read, I liked the CSK books best. I plan to use
Day of Tears for a morning reading book next year at my school and want to incorporate
Monster as an eighth grade class set.
I don’t think awarded literature is better than what else is “out there” but I think it can prove useful as a guide to librarians. Below are the citations for the nine awarded books I read and their respective categories. You can read my review of each book in coming blogs.
Caldecott:
Henkes, K. (2004).
Kitten’s first full moon. New York: HarperCollins.
Selznick, B. (2007).
The invention of Hugo Cabret. New York: Scholastic.
Swanson, S. (2008).
The house in the night. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Willems, M. (2004).
Knuffle bunny: A cautionary tale. New York: Hyperion.
Willems, M. (2007).
Knuffle bunny too: A case of mistaken identity. New York: Hyperion.
Newbery:
Gaiman, Neil. (2008).
The graveyard book. New York: HarperCollins.
Hale, Shannon. (2005).
Princess academy. New York: Bloomsbury.
Coretta Scott King:
Myers, Walter Dean. (2001).
Monster. New York: HarperCollins.
Lester, Julius. (2005).
Day of tears: A novel in dialogue. New York: Hyperion.